Posted by: Rob Lester | July 27, 2011

“Hobbit” skull asymmetry indicates humanity of H. floresiensis

In 2004, some partial skeletons and one complete skull were found in a cave on the Indonesian island of Flores. Discoverers proclaimed this was a specimen belonged to a new species, which was dubbed Homo floresiensis. Or, more popularly, “Hobbit Man” (due to its small size). A September 2010 PhysOrg.com article reported, “Robert Eckhardt, professor of developmental genetics and evolutionary morphology at Penn State, and Maciej Henneberg, Wood Jones professor of anthropological and comparative anatomy at the University of Adelaide, dispute that the skull represents a new species in the Aug. 31 issue of American Journal of Physical Anthropology. They believe instead that “the hobbit skull was actually from an abnormal Homo sapiens.” It was the asymmetry of the skull that led the discoverers to assume that they had found a new species. Normal human skull asymmetry is less than one percent. The “hobbit” skull, however, showed measurements of six percent or more. Eckhardt and Henneberg determined that this extreme ratio was indicative of “disordered development,” and of not a new species, but a malformed human ancestor. Those believing that the “hobbit” is a new species attributed the severe asymmetry to posterior deformational plagiocephaly (PDP), which results from excessive pressure on the head of a developing infant. But, “Eckhardt and Henneberg offer a rebuttal, pointing out that PDP occurs, in part, because of the way humans give birth—to relatively helpless newborns with soft skull bones. The twist is that evolutionists consider this form of birth to have developed later than the time when H. floresiensis supposedly diverged from the hominid line that allegedly developed into modern humans.” PDP, therefore, cannot explain the asymmetry and the evidence strongly points toward H. floresiensis merely being a malformed modern human, perhaps with microcephaly (as other research has indicated). “Eckhardt said that, aside from having a tiny brain, [the skull specimen] resembles the normal people who still live on Flores in many features (such as jaws and teeth)”. Eckhart candidly reveals that “many researchers in the field of paleoanthropology tend to favor differences as evidence of a new species rather than looking at characteristics as reflecting child development.” We see this same bias in Homo erectus, Neanderthal Man, and other so-called “missing links.” The structural features always fall within the normal range of modern human anatomy. Why the rush to proclaim a new species? There is a certain attraction for discovering and having one’s name attached to a new species. It doesn’t hurt the chances for grant money either.

http://www.physorg.com/news202977515.html

Advertisements

Responses

  1. “The structural features always fall within the normal range of modern human anatomy. Why the rush to proclaim a new species?”

    It may as well indicate, that the human gene pool is not unified after all. Looking at the pace at which cancer is spreading within our multicultural society, one might assume the fight for survival is at its peak.
    We are different.
    We should eat the food our ancestors used to eat, yet we don’t share the same ancestors. Try to make Chinese people drink pastorized milk and they will puke it right back at you. And rightly so.
    There are people born with no sense of rhythm, others are great at maths yet suck at drawing or will never get their heads around how to read a map.
    We are living in symbiosis without even knowing.
    It is the diversity within our society that makes us face the challenges and overcome our weaknesses, it is when we combine our strenghts that we move forward.

  2. peter is 100% wrong.

    • Darnell, unless you can be more specific I will delete your comment. Please list some reasons for your disagreement.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: